7. 11. 2022

New Regulation of Beneficiary Owners

The new Czech law on the registration of beneficial owners had to be substantially amended just about a year after its adoption. This was due to pressure from the European Commission, which criticized some parts of the Czech legislation for being inconsistent with the regulation and objectives of the European Anti-Money-Laundry (AML) Directive.

The Commission was particularly concerned about the definition of the beneficial owner and some exceptions to the obligation to register. The Czech side did not manage to convince the Commission of the functionality of its concept. Even after a year of negotiations it finally gave in to the Commission's opinion and amended the Czech law on the registration of beneficial owners.

The amendment abolishes the existing two-component definition of the beneficial owner based on the concepts of ultimate beneficiary and person with ultimate influence. In particular, the concept of ultimate beneficiary, which according to the Commission is not included in the definition of the AML Directive, is abolished. The existing definitions are therefore replaced by a very general definition taken from Article 3(6) of the AML Directive. The indication of the nature of the beneficial owner's position will be reduced to whether it is direct or indirect and whether it is a material or formal beneficial owner. Still, only a specific natural person can be a beneficial owner. Also, there may be more than one beneficial owner.

Under the new law, a beneficial owner is any physical person who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity or legal arrangement. Such ownership or control is based on either of the following: i) an interest in the corporation or an interest in voting rights greater than 25%; ii) an interest in profits, other equity or liquidation proceeds greater than 25%; iii) exercising a controlling influence in the corporation or in corporations that individually or collectively have an interest in the corporation greater than 25%; or iv) exercising a controlling influence in the corporation by other means.

By Mgr. Radek Werich

Download

G&P Newsletter 3/2022 (PDF)

Author

Mgr. Radek Werich LL.M.

Mgr. Radek Werich LL.M.

Neuigkeiten & Publikationen

Conflicts of Interest: A Three-Layer Problem with Real Money at Stake

Conflicts of Interest: A Three-Layer Problem with Real Money at Stake

Babiš’s conflict-of-interest problem is not just politics – it is a three-layer legal framework, with the sharpest impact coming from the pub-lic-money firewall in Sections 4b and 4c. We explain why shifting Agrofert into trust-type structures still raises doubts, and why the Hartenberg arm remains a key part of the story. A brisk read on the limits of Czech legislation and why the European Commission’s next steps may keep this issue alive.

A Cabinet Minister: To Be or Not To Be?

A Cabinet Minister: To Be or Not To Be?

A Czech ministerial nomination turns into a constitutional stress test: can the President refuse the Prime Minister’s pick in a parliamentary system? The Filip Turek saga - ending in a “government commissioner” workaround - raises hard questions about institutional boundaries, incompatibility rules, and the rule of law.

The Digital Hallucination: A CZK 25,000 Lesson in AI Legal Ethics

The Digital Hallucination: A CZK 25,000 Lesson in AI Legal Ethics

Constitutional Court penalizes an attorney for submission based on "hallucinated" AI-generated content.