
23. 10. 2024
New Consumer Protection Act Update Your Terms and Conditions
The new Consumer Protection Act enhances consumer protection significantly. E.g. the withdrawal period is extended from 14 to 30 days for agreements concluded during unsolicited visits to consumers' homes or at sales events. The law also strengthens protection against artificial price increases prior to discounted sales events, such as Black Friday. It also enhances online protection against non-transparent purchasing practices, fraudulent reviews, and deceptive marketing.
The new law also brings several benefits for companies. It removes certain administrative obligations that previously burdened sellers without adding real value to consumer protection. It is no longer required to post a notice of planned temporary business closures at least 24 hours in advance. The new Consumer Protection Act also introduces a "second chance" mechanism. This allows sellers to avoid or reduce penalties if they voluntarily cease legal violations and take corrective measures to benefit affected consumers. It also establishes new principles for imposing fines, setting them as a percentage of the seller's turnover to avoid excessively harsh penalties.
The Consumer Protection Act clarifies, modernizes, and aligns current consumer legislation with EU regulations. It introduces significant changes in the legal regulation of liability for defects (complaints), altering rights of consumers as well as their exercise. Sellers are now required to inform consumers about such aspects as compatibility and interoperability of digital goods. Last but not least, there are changes to the terminology used in consumer law. E-shop operating sellers, in particular, should be mindful of these changes and make sure to update their terms and conditions, as well as other documentation.
By Mgr. David Benčat & JUDr. Valter Pieger
Download
Author
Neuigkeiten & Publikationen
Another Success for Giese & Partner Before the European Court of Human Rights
The European Court of Human Rights has once again confirmed the arguments presented by Giese & Partner. In a recent case, the Czech Republic acknowledged a violation of the right to a fair trial, marking another successful outcome for attorney-at-law Ondřej Rathouský before the ECtHR.
From Ankara to Brno: Why the Constitutional Court Intervened Before Deciding the NATO Dispute
The Czech Constitutional Court’s interim measure secured the President’s participation in the NATO summit but left the underlying constitutional dispute unresolved. The case highlights the role of established constitutional practice when the written Constitution provides no clear answer and raises broader questions about the balance of power between the President and the Government.
Who Will Inherit Your Digital Life? Digital Estate Part One
What happens to online accounts, cloud-stored data and cryptocurrency after death? This introduction to the digital estate explains which assets may pass to heirs, why legal inheritance does not always mean practical access and what the German Facebook case reveals about digital inheritance.