
23. 10. 2024
Employment to Become More Flexible
The government approved an amendment to the existing rules to increase flexibility of labour relationships. Now, the draft needs to be confirmed by the Parliament.
Termination of the employment should be made easier. The start of the termination notice period would be newly defined as date of delivery of the termination notice. The termination periods connected with a breach of work discipline or in cases when an employee does not meet the prerequisites/requirements for performance of the agreed work would be shortened.
Employees who return to work from parental leave before their child turns two years, would be guaranteed the same work position at the same work place. In addition, work and family life balance should be supported by the fact that parents on a parental leave would be allowed to perform their work by the same employer based on an agreement to complete a job (DPP) or an agreement to perform work (DPČ).
There are also other interesting adjustments, such as a prolongation of the maximum length of the probationary period.
It will be interesting to follow what changes of the Labour Code will be made by the parliament. We will of course keep you updated.
By Mgr. Bc. Jaroslava Novotná
Download
Author
News & Publications
Marie Zámečníková als Referentin in Düsseldorf
Unsere Kollegin Marie Zámečníková, Senior Associate bei Giese & Partner, nimmt an der Fachtagung „Namensverfassungsrecht“ am 19. Juni 2026 in Düsseldorf teil.
Ernst Giese als Referent beim DAT 2026 in Freiburg
Dr. Ernst Giese, Partner bei Giese & Partner, wird beim Deutschen Anwaltstag 2026 in Freiburg als Referent auftreten. Er beteiligt sich an einer Diskussionsveranstaltung zu europäischen Perspektiven auf die Zukunft der Anwaltschaft, mit besonderem Fokus auf aktuelle Entwicklungen und neue Technologien.
A State at Odds: Who Gets to Represent the Czech Republic at NATO?
Who speaks for the Czech Republic abroad when the President and Government disagree? This article traces the constitutional clash over attendance at the NATO summit and the broader tension between the President’s external-representation role and the Government’s politically accountable control of foreign and defense policy.