
26. 2. 2026
Not an Heir, Yet Still in the Case? A Key Supreme Court Ruling on Inheritance Proceedings
The Czech Supreme Court brings an important clarification of procedural rules in inheritance proceedings, with a direct impact on the legal practice.
Background of the Decision
During inheritance proceedings, it may become clear that a person initially regarded as an heir does not, in fact, have any inheritance rights - for example due to a will, disinheritance, or statutory succession rules. A recurring practical question is therefore:
When does such a person cease to be a party to the proceedings?
The Supreme Court answered unequivocally: A person remains a party to inheritance proceedings until a decision expressly terminating their participation becomes final and binding. A mere finding that inheritance rights do not exist is not sufficient.
Why the Ruling Matters
The Court clearly distinguishes between:
the substantive assessment of inheritance rights, and
the procedural status of a party to the proceedings.
Until the termination decision becomes final, a “putative” heir retains full procedural rights, including:
the right to be informed about the proceedings,
access to the case file,
the right to comment on evidence, and
where applicable, the right to lodge remedies.
Practical Implications
The ruling has important consequences for the legal practice:
Service of documents: Court commissioners must continue serving documents on the person concerned until the decision becomes final; failure to do so may constitute a procedural defect.
Procedural certainty: A potential heir cannot be excluded informally or prematurely without a formal decision.
Disputed estates: The decision is particularly relevant in disputes over the validity of wills or inheritance capacity.
Legal strategy: The ruling provides a strong basis for protecting clients’ procedural rights and challenging defective court or notarial conduct.
Conclusion
With this decision, the Supreme Court reinforces procedural safeguards in inheritance proceedings and confirms that strict compliance with procedural rules is required even in probate matters. For practitioners, it is a key precedent in complex or contested inheritance cases.
So, even if a person is ultimately found not to be an heir, they remain a party to inheritance proceedings until a final decision expressly ends their participation. Courts and notaries must respect their procedural rights throughout this period.
By Mgr. Jana Kostěncová
Download
Author
News & Publications
Conflicts of Interest: A Three-Layer Problem with Real Money at Stake
Babiš’s conflict-of-interest problem is not just politics – it is a three-layer legal framework, with the sharpest impact coming from the pub-lic-money firewall in Sections 4b and 4c. We explain why shifting Agrofert into trust-type structures still raises doubts, and why the Hartenberg arm remains a key part of the story. A brisk read on the limits of Czech legislation and why the European Commission’s next steps may keep this issue alive.
A Cabinet Minister: To Be or Not To Be?
A Czech ministerial nomination turns into a constitutional stress test: can the President refuse the Prime Minister’s pick in a parliamentary system? The Filip Turek saga - ending in a “government commissioner” workaround - raises hard questions about institutional boundaries, incompatibility rules, and the rule of law.
The Digital Hallucination: A CZK 25,000 Lesson in AI Legal Ethics
Constitutional Court penalizes an attorney for submission based on "hallucinated" AI-generated content.