21. 2. 2025

Debt Collection Made Faster

Significant amendments to the Civil Procedure Code have changed how payment orders are delivered, impacting both creditors and debtors. The primary goal of these changes is to streamline court procedures, especially in debt collection, making them faster and more efficient.

Key Changes to Delivery of Payment Orders

Under the new rules, a payment order delivered to a data box will be considered "delivered" 10 days after being sent, even if the recipient does not open it. This will speed up the process and reduce delays, as creditors can quickly obtain an enforceable title. However, for other delivery methods, the existing practice remains the same. In case the recipient doesn't accept delivery, the order is considered undelivered, and the court may cancel it.

For creditors, the new system offers a more efficient way to recover debts, eliminating the need for multiple legal steps. However, debtors who don't actively monitor their data box may risk missing important notices. The 10-day window for accessing the box adds pressure on recipients to stay aware of incoming documents.

Other Notable Changes

The amendment also removes the cap on the value of claims that can be processed through electronic payment orders, allowing larger amounts (over 1mio CZK) to be handled more easily. Additionally, if delivery attempts fail, notices will be posted on the court's official board, requiring defendants to stay vigilant.

Conclusion

These changes, while improving efficiency, place more responsibility on debtors to monitor their data boxes. Creditors will benefit from faster enforcement, but debtors must be proactive to avoid missing critical court notices.

By Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

Download

G&P Newsletter 1/2025 (PDF)

Author

Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

News & Publications

Conflicts of Interest: A Three-Layer Problem with Real Money at Stake

Conflicts of Interest: A Three-Layer Problem with Real Money at Stake

Babiš’s conflict-of-interest problem is not just politics – it is a three-layer legal framework, with the sharpest impact coming from the pub-lic-money firewall in Sections 4b and 4c. We explain why shifting Agrofert into trust-type structures still raises doubts, and why the Hartenberg arm remains a key part of the story. A brisk read on the limits of Czech legislation and why the European Commission’s next steps may keep this issue alive.

A Cabinet Minister: To Be or Not To Be?

A Cabinet Minister: To Be or Not To Be?

A Czech ministerial nomination turns into a constitutional stress test: can the President refuse the Prime Minister’s pick in a parliamentary system? The Filip Turek saga - ending in a “government commissioner” workaround - raises hard questions about institutional boundaries, incompatibility rules, and the rule of law.

The Digital Hallucination: A CZK 25,000 Lesson in AI Legal Ethics

The Digital Hallucination: A CZK 25,000 Lesson in AI Legal Ethics

Constitutional Court penalizes an attorney for submission based on "hallucinated" AI-generated content.