21. 2. 2025

Debt Collection Made Faster

Significant amendments to the Civil Procedure Code have changed how payment orders are delivered, impacting both creditors and debtors. The primary goal of these changes is to streamline court procedures, especially in debt collection, making them faster and more efficient.

Key Changes to Delivery of Payment Orders

Under the new rules, a payment order delivered to a data box will be considered "delivered" 10 days after being sent, even if the recipient does not open it. This will speed up the process and reduce delays, as creditors can quickly obtain an enforceable title. However, for other delivery methods, the existing practice remains the same. In case the recipient doesn't accept delivery, the order is considered undelivered, and the court may cancel it.

For creditors, the new system offers a more efficient way to recover debts, eliminating the need for multiple legal steps. However, debtors who don't actively monitor their data box may risk missing important notices. The 10-day window for accessing the box adds pressure on recipients to stay aware of incoming documents.

Other Notable Changes

The amendment also removes the cap on the value of claims that can be processed through electronic payment orders, allowing larger amounts (over 1mio CZK) to be handled more easily. Additionally, if delivery attempts fail, notices will be posted on the court's official board, requiring defendants to stay vigilant.

Conclusion

These changes, while improving efficiency, place more responsibility on debtors to monitor their data boxes. Creditors will benefit from faster enforcement, but debtors must be proactive to avoid missing critical court notices.

By Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

Download

G&P Newsletter 1/2025 (PDF)

Author

Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

Mgr. Jana Kostěncová

News & Publications

Another Success for Giese & Partner Before the European Court of Human Rights

Another Success for Giese & Partner Before the European Court of Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights has once again confirmed the arguments presented by Giese & Partner. In a recent case, the Czech Republic acknowledged a violation of the right to a fair trial, marking another successful outcome for attorney-at-law Ondřej Rathouský before the ECtHR.

From Ankara to Brno: Why the Constitutional Court Intervened Before Deciding the NATO Dispute

From Ankara to Brno: Why the Constitutional Court Intervened Before Deciding the NATO Dispute

The Czech Constitutional Court’s interim measure secured the President’s participation in the NATO summit but left the underlying constitutional dispute unresolved. The case highlights the role of established constitutional practice when the written Constitution provides no clear answer and raises broader questions about the balance of power between the President and the Government.

Who Will Inherit Your Digital Life? Digital Estate Part One

Who Will Inherit Your Digital Life? Digital Estate Part One

What happens to online accounts, cloud-stored data and cryptocurrency after death? This introduction to the digital estate explains which assets may pass to heirs, why legal inheritance does not always mean practical access and what the German Facebook case reveals about digital inheritance.