4. 3. 2024

Costs Reimbursement for Remote Work

A new home office regulation sets new rules for the reimbursement of costs connected with remote work.

There are basically three ways to deal with costs reimbursement: (i) the respective employee proves to the employer the costs that have arisen in relation to work from home, or (ii) if agreed in writing or stipulated under an internal regulation, a lump sum is provided to the employee per each commenced hour of work, or (iii) the employee and the employer agree in writing in advance that no costs reimbursement (or its part) shall be provided to the employee.

The (actual) amount of the lump sum was set by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs for the year 2024 at CZK 4.50. It needs to be noted that unless we deal with a specific category of employers specified under the Czech Labour Code, such as the state, a state fund etc., a higher lump sum may be provided to the employee.

The payment shall be made in the calendar month following the month in which the employee became entitled to the lump sum. In case the costs reimbursement shall be provided also to an employee working on the basis of an agreement to complete a job or an agreement to perform work (DPP / DPČ), this needs to be agreed with the employer.

By Mgr. Bc. Jaroslava Novotná

Download

G&P Newsletter 1/2024(PDF)

Author

News & Publications

G&P Photo Contest 2026

G&P Photo Contest 2026

Giese & Partner held a photo contest for team members this year with the theme "Weather Moods".

Another Success for Giese & Partner Before the European Court of Human Rights

Another Success for Giese & Partner Before the European Court of Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights has once again confirmed the arguments presented by Giese & Partner. In a recent case, the Czech Republic acknowledged a violation of the right to a fair trial, marking another successful outcome for attorney-at-law Ondřej Rathouský before the ECtHR.

From Ankara to Brno: Why the Constitutional Court Intervened Before Deciding the NATO Dispute

From Ankara to Brno: Why the Constitutional Court Intervened Before Deciding the NATO Dispute

The Czech Constitutional Court’s interim measure secured the President’s participation in the NATO summit but left the underlying constitutional dispute unresolved. The case highlights the role of established constitutional practice when the written Constitution provides no clear answer and raises broader questions about the balance of power between the President and the Government.