22. 6. 2022

A Costly Mistake by the Tax Office

The Czech tax administration overcharged a large number of tax pages. This can be concluded from a recent ruling by the Supreme Administrative Court, which struck down a malpractice of the Czech tax administration. According to the court, the tax administration miscalculated the (default) interest on taxes owed.

As a result, tens of or perhaps even hundreds of millions of CZK are to be returned to taxpayers altogether. Tax Offices across the country are currently reviewing all cases of tax assessments since 2015.

The wrongly charged interest on unpaid taxes was caused by a misinterpretation of the law by the tax administration. Until 2014, the rule was that if tax officials assessed a company for taxes owed, they could only charge default interest for five years. If, for example, they discovered an underpayment from an accounting period 7 years ago, the tax administration could only charge interest for five years. Starting in 2015 an amendment to the law abolished this rule, allowing the tax administration to claim interest for the entire period.

The tax administration began to adhere to the new law also in respect to interest calculation related to taxes owed prior to 2015. It should be noted that the interest rate is rather significant, as it is calculated based on a repo rate of the Czech National Bank plus 14 percent, which means that the actual rate varied between 15 and 20 percent in the past 8 years.

The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that this practice of the tax administration is wrong. According to the court, the new 2015 rule cannot be applied to taxes assessed before that. "If the original due date of the tax occurred before 1 January 2015, the rule limiting the length of interest on late payment to a period of five years applies when calculating interest on late payment," confirmed the ruling.

The tax administration will have to return to taxpayers illegally claimed interest payments. On top of that, the mandatory interest applies – i.e. the above repo rate plus 14 percent. Since we are speaking of payments related to the period before 2015, the amounts to be returned to the taxpayers in individual cases may be rather hefty. On the other hand, this mistake of the tax administration will ultimately be paid from the pockets of the other taxpayers.

By Mgr. Radek Werich

Download

G&P Newsletter 2/2022 (PDF)

Author

Mgr. Radek Werich LL.M.

Mgr. Radek Werich LL.M.

News & Publications

Marie Zámečníková als Referentin in Düsseldorf

Marie Zámečníková als Referentin in Düsseldorf

Unsere Kollegin Marie Zámečníková, Senior Associate bei Giese & Partner, nimmt an der Fachtagung „Namensverfassungsrecht“ am 19. Juni 2026 in Düsseldorf teil.

Ernst Giese als Referent beim DAT 2026 in Freiburg

Ernst Giese als Referent beim DAT 2026 in Freiburg

Dr. Ernst Giese, Partner bei Giese & Partner, wird beim Deutschen Anwaltstag 2026 in Freiburg als Referent auftreten. Er beteiligt sich an einer Diskussionsveranstaltung zu europäischen Perspektiven auf die Zukunft der Anwaltschaft, mit besonderem Fokus auf aktuelle Entwicklungen und neue Technologien.

A State at Odds: Who Gets to Represent the Czech Republic at NATO?

A State at Odds: Who Gets to Represent the Czech Republic at NATO?

Who speaks for the Czech Republic abroad when the President and Government disagree? This article traces the constitutional clash over attendance at the NATO summit and the broader tension between the President’s external-representation role and the Government’s politically accountable control of foreign and defense policy.