Dr. jur. Ernst Giese

Rechtsanwalt | partner


Location

Prague

Languages

German, English, Czech, French


Practice areas


Work experience and education

2009 Opening a branch office of Giese & Partner in Bratislava, Slovakia

2000 Founding partner and managing director of the company Giese & Partner in Prague, Czech Republic

1997 Founder and managing director of Prague branch of the Frankfurt association Schürmann & Partner (predecessor of Giese & Partner)

1995 Doctoral degree from the School of Law at the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany (Dr. jur.)

Membership
  • DAV - German Bar Association (admitted since 1995)

  • ČAK - Czech Bar Association (admitted since 1997)

  • SAK - Slovak Bar Association (admitted since 2009)

  • DIS - The German Arbitration Institute (association for the promotion of national and international arbitration)

  • ICC Germany (German national committee of the International Chamber of Commerce)

  • IBA - International Bar Association

  • INSOL Europe - European organisation of professionals who specialise in insolvency, business reconstruction and recovery

  • III - International Insolvency Institute

  • UIA - Union Internationale de Avocat

  • Institut für Erbrecht - The association of inheritance law specialists

Publications and activities

Porušení dohody o “konkurenční činnosti zaměstnance” a okamžité zrušení pracovního poměru

Porušení dohody o “konkurenční činnosti zaměstnance” a okamžité zrušení pracovního poměru

Může dát zaměstnavatel zaměstnanci souhlas s vykonáváním konkurenční činnosti s omezeními sjednanými v dohodě? A jaké může mít důsledky porušení sjednaných omezení?

Corporate Law Changes 2021

Corporate Law Changes 2021

Czech companies face substantial legal changes in the beginning of the year 2021. Here are the most important ones.

Secured Creditors Celebrate

Secured Creditors Celebrate

A December’s decision of the Czech Constitutional Court (I. ÚS 760/18) came as sweet ending for banks and other creditors of the otherwise grim year. The Constitution Court pleased the lenders by annulling a decision of the Supreme Court in the case known as “Elma-Therm”